• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Bylaws
    • Strategic Plan
    • Annual Reports
    • Administrative Centre Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Members
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Join or Renew
    • Get Involved
    • Awards
  • Opportunities
    • Interest Groups
    • The Conference
    • The Journal
    • International Collaborative Writing Groups
    • ISSOTL Fellows Program
    • Committees
    • Board of Directors
  • Events
    • Annual Conference
      • Conference Listing
  • Publications
    • Teaching & Learning Inquiry
    • ISSOTL Blog
  • Updates
    • Blog
    • News
    • Jobs
    • ISSOTL Social Media
    • Become a Member
    • Log in
International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL)
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Bylaws
    • Strategic Plan
    • Annual Reports
    • Administrative Centre Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Members
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Join or Renew
    • Get Involved
    • Awards
  • Opportunities
    • Interest Groups
    • The Conference
    • The Journal
    • International Collaborative Writing Groups
    • ISSOTL Fellows Program
    • Committees
    • Board of Directors
  • Events
    • Annual Conference
      • Conference Listing
  • Publications
    • Teaching & Learning Inquiry
    • ISSOTL Blog
  • Updates
    • Blog
    • News
    • Jobs
    • ISSOTL Social Media
    • Become a Member
    • Log in

Blog

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Blog
  • SoTL’s “Multidisciplinary Boundlessness” and Advocacy

SoTL’s “Multidisciplinary Boundlessness” and Advocacy

  • Posted by ISSOTL Admin
  • Categories Blog
  • Date March 23, 2019

by Kiara Mikita

This post is in response to a call for ISSOTL blog posts highlighting SoTL advocacy and opportunities in the disciplines. My academic expertise is in sexual violence and how we talk about it. My disciplinary training is in sociology, and my methodological training is varied, but rests preferentially with qualitative methods. My research and teaching, very intentionally, has an advocacy bend to it – I want my work to be applicable, on the ground, importantly informed by anti-oppressive theoretical frameworks. So, the inter-, cross-, and transdisciplinary possibilities opened up by SoTL and the applicable advocacy goals that it makes possible are, for me, where SoTL and social justice are most brilliantly paired. In this way, I interpret advocacy as extending beyond supporting the application of SoTL within disciplines, but demonstrating SoTL’s boundless multidisciplinarity, and the social justice advocacy and opportunities this makes possible.

For example, some of my SoTL work is presently focused upon bringing researchers and community members together monthly to promote cross-disciplinary and cross-experiential conversation, build community, and ultimately generate transdisciplinary research and education priorities for sexual violence work on and off campus. My research invites academics, victim-facing professionals (e.g., counsellors, law enforcement/security, medical practitioners, crowns/legal, etc.), and students to sit at the table and engage in active learning activities that promote dialogue and facilitate community building. In our monthly gatherings, after engaging in various playful icebreakers, participants will be invited to take part in SoTL-informed exercises intended to diminish the “silo effect” that is characteristic of sexual violence work, where great work is being done within various disciplines, but in isolation, detached from and uninformed by one another.

Borrowing from threshold concepts, one session will invite participants to describe what concepts are essential and epiphanic to their descriptions of sexual violence when they teach, train, or talk to others about it – and to share these descriptions with those outside of their respective spheres. Participants will be invited to reflect upon how this extra-disciplinary and/or extra-experiential knowledge affects and strengthens what they already knew about sexual violence. Similarly, drawing upon signature pedagogies, participants will be invited to discuss the key habits, tools, and practices they use when ‘doing’ these threshold descriptions. Later, they will be invited to reflect upon how learning about divergent ways of teaching, training, and talking with others about sexual violence grows their content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge of sexual violence, as well as their awareness of how it is taken up outside of their respective spheres of experience.

Once participants have spent several sessions together, they will be invited to together contemplate transdisciplinary research and education priorities – priorities that are deemed relevant by and to all disciplines engaged in formal and informal sexual violence teaching and learning. This notion of transdisciplinarity is intentional, introduced as “an epistemological innovation to foster multi-perspectivity, context-sensitivity and stakeholder involvement” (Novy, Habersack, & Shaller, 2013) among groups that have historically worked in silos. Participants will be asked to identify the questions, tools, and topics that have the most impactful potential for learning about sexual violence, and that are collectively determined as most essential to study and share with others doing this work.

My sociological and qualitative training and my previous research experience engaging with practitioners working in sexual violence will help me hear the nuance and the themes in participants exchanges and in the material they produce throughout this series (e.g., minute papers and critical incident reports). Additionally, the “community in conversation” framework that I used to envision this study – an adaptation of Palmer’s “community of truth” (1998) – was inspired by a teaching and learning colleague whose background is in education. Likewise, the scaffolding of this series as a trajectory culminating in the establishment of priorities – this process of “integrated knowledge translation” – is an approach popular in health research, and one given shape by another teaching and learning colleague whose history is in nursing.

On the whole, while SoTL possibilities within my discipline of sociology are significant and varied (Kathleen McKinney recently posted an important snapshot of The Status of SoTL in Sociology), my SoTL advocacy emerges from its multidisciplinarity, and the way that my own work has flourished and been strengthened by it. While my curiosities will likely always be sociological in orientation, it is SoTL’s multidisciplinary boundlessness – and especially its “axiological domain” (Booth & Wollacott, 2017) – that I am most inspired by, and advocate most for the opportunities it makes possible.

Kiara Mikita, PhD
Postdoctoral Scholar, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL)
Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning | University of Calgary

  • Share:
author avatar
ISSOTL Admin

Previous post

The Beginnings of Engagement in Nursing Scholarship
March 23, 2019

Next post

New SoTL Award in Family Science
March 23, 2019

You may also like

EdVee+Blog+Image
EdVee: A Visual Diagnostic and Course Design Tool for Constructive Alignment
27 January, 2023
75079_image
Searching and Reviewing the Literature on Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): An Academic Literacies Perspective Parts 1 & 2
27 January, 2023
69375_image
A Pedagogy of Slow: Integrating Experiences of Physical and Virtual Gallery Spaces to Foster Critical Engagement in SoTL
26 January, 2023

Search

Categories

  • Blog
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal Content

Archives

  • January 2023 (7)
  • December 2022 (1)
  • November 2022 (1)
  • October 2022 (6)
  • September 2022 (2)
  • August 2022 (4)
  • July 2022 (5)
  • June 2022 (4)
  • May 2022 (2)
  • April 2022 (2)
  • March 2022 (9)
  • February 2022 (7)
  • January 2022 (6)
  • December 2021 (4)
  • November 2021 (4)
  • October 2021 (2)
  • September 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (1)
  • June 2021 (1)
  • May 2021 (2)
  • April 2021 (1)
  • March 2021 (2)
  • February 2021 (5)
  • January 2021 (2)
  • December 2020 (4)
  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (4)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (3)
  • January 2020 (2)
  • November 2019 (5)
  • October 2019 (31)
  • September 2019 (3)
  • July 2019 (1)
  • April 2019 (3)
  • March 2019 (27)
  • January 2019 (2)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (6)
  • August 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • March 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (3)
  • December 2017 (2)
  • November 2017 (1)
  • October 2017 (3)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • August 2017 (5)
  • June 2017 (4)
  • May 2017 (2)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (3)
  • February 2017 (2)
  • January 2017 (4)
  • November 2016 (3)
  • October 2016 (4)
  • September 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (1)
  • May 2016 (1)
  • April 2016 (3)
  • March 2016 (1)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (1)
  • December 2015 (3)
  • November 2015 (6)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (1)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (2)
  • April 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (2)
  • January 2015 (3)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (1)
  • August 2014 (1)
  • May 2014 (1)
  • April 2014 (1)
  • January 2014 (3)
  • December 2013 (3)
  • November 2013 (1)

ISSOTL

© 2023 International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL) All rights reserved.

Contact Us

MENU

ABOUT

MEMBERS

OPPORTUNITIES

EVENTS

PUBLICATIONS

UPDATES

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Youtube

Web Design by Clio Websites. Powered by WordPress.

Login with your site account

Lost your password?