• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Bylaws
    • Strategic Plan
    • Annual Reports
    • Administrative Centre Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Members
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Join or Renew
    • Get Involved
    • Awards
  • Opportunities
    • Interest Groups
    • The Conference
    • The Journal
    • International Collaborative Writing Groups
    • ISSOTL Fellows Program
    • Committees
    • Board of Directors
  • Events
    • Annual Conference
      • Conference Listing
  • Publications
    • Teaching & Learning Inquiry
    • ISSOTL Blog
  • Updates
    • Blog
    • News
    • Jobs
    • ISSOTL Social Media
    • Become a Member
    • Log in
International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL)
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Bylaws
    • Strategic Plan
    • Annual Reports
    • Administrative Centre Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Members
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Join or Renew
    • Get Involved
    • Awards
  • Opportunities
    • Interest Groups
    • The Conference
    • The Journal
    • International Collaborative Writing Groups
    • ISSOTL Fellows Program
    • Committees
    • Board of Directors
  • Events
    • Annual Conference
      • Conference Listing
  • Publications
    • Teaching & Learning Inquiry
    • ISSOTL Blog
  • Updates
    • Blog
    • News
    • Jobs
    • ISSOTL Social Media
    • Become a Member
    • Log in

Blog

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Blog
  • The SoTL Lit Review, The SoTL Librarian

The SoTL Lit Review, The SoTL Librarian

  • Posted by ISSOTL Admin
  • Categories Blog
  • Date February 13, 2016
  • Comments 0 comment

As Teaching & Learning Inquiry co-editor Gary Poole and I have observed, one of our reviewers’ most common reasons for sending a submission back to the author (for revisions or rejection) is the need for a stronger grounding in relevant research on teaching and learning—an effective SoTL lit review.

Last week, Margy MacMillan led a two-hour workshop on the SoTL lit review here at the University of Calgary’s Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning. Margy is professor and instruction librarian at Mount Royal University, just across the Bow River. In the world of the scholarship of teaching and learning, Margy is a powerful presence behind the scenes as undoubtedly the most active librarian in the international SoTL community. She calls hummingbirdherself an “information hummingbird,” taking information from one place and distributing it more broadly. She was also the secret weapon on ISSOTL’s Publications Advisory Committee that worked tirelessly to facilitate the transition of Teaching & Learning Inquiryfrom Indiana University Press to the University of Calgary’s open access collections. To be sure, though, she’s not solely behind the scenes, as illustrated by her list of publications about her own SoTL projects and her SoTL partnerships with faculty partners.

I can’t remember the last time I got so many queries about an event being recorded, repeated, or documented in some way. TLI reviewers aren’t the only ones aware of the need for stronger lit reviews in SoTL work: it’s one of the main sources of anxiety in SoTL (Chick, et al. 2014). And so I offer some of the highlights of Margy’s workshop—and recommend other Centers and Institutes to invite her to campus (in person or via Skype) to do the full workshop with local colleagues.

What makes searching SoTL different from the familiar experiences of searching within our disciplines?

  • She told us to “search the way [we] did as undergraduates.” Unlike our areas of expertise in which we know the major researchers, we may not know the big names relevant to our SoTL project, so we should go back to searching by subject (Foster, 2010).
  • The SoTL literature “isn’t networked very well and doesn’t cite itself well,” so rather than the more typical searchable connections that look like a big tree, “SoTL is a strawberry field,” and we need to look within a variety of patches.
  • Unsurprisingly, the search terms will be different from what we’re used to, and we may not have taken the time to systematically collect search terms in years. Margy gave us five minutes to develop clusters of terms relevant to our area of interest, which we’d shared during introductions:

 

  • Margy’s notes about potential areas of interest among the workshop participants
    • the phenomenon: field experiences, prior knowledge, reading, teamwork, visual thinking
    • the population: undergraduate students, graduate students, at-risk students
    • methods and their related terms: quantitative (surveys, sample), qualitative (emergent themes, close reading, grounded theory, Glaser and Strauss), longitudinal
    • other: effective, benefits, “significant difference,” signature pedagogy
    • discipline: our own, but also others “where there might be a common issue, pedagogy, method, etc” (Margy intentionally and emphatically places this search last, so we don’t myopically fall back on searching in the familiar places. She mentioned her study of student reading, which led her into the unfamiliar but highly relevant territories of phenomenography, close reading, and neurobiology.)
  • Many of the articles we find will probably be different from those we’re used to, and we can react to this unfamiliarity with the same frustration and resistance as our students (Weller, 2011). We have to be open to new terms, methods, and article styles, formats, and lengths.
Where should we search?
  • Here’s where you’d be wise to bring Margy in for a workshop at your institution. She worked with our institution’s library website before taking us out to the wider internet.
    • Start with our library’s specific discovery system, or the search box set up to cut across its catalogue and databases, such as ours.
    • Also search dissertations and theses, not only for the “Growing body of thesis literature on teaching and learning,” but also “for their bibliographies and instruments.”
  • She encouraged us to use Mendeley, a reference manager and PDF organizer for cataloging sources we may use. At this stage, we can search Mendeley for sources others have collected (e.g., SoTL AND graduate education).Google Scholar's Cited By
  • She pointed us to Google Scholar, not only because it’s sure to search across disciplines but also because it includes more open access materials, and because its powerful “Cited by” function is a great way to start exploring the relevant literature. (See image above.)
    • We can also set up alerts for our searches to learn about new sources related to our query.
    • Here are what some sample searches look like:
      • SoTL graduate education pedagogy
      • “pedagogy training” effective “graduate students”
      • SoTL (“graduate education” OR “teaching assistant”)
    • To narrow the search, use the intitle: command before a key term or the specific context (e.g. SoTL graduate education intitle:humanities) or allintitle: to narrow even further (e.g., allintitle:SoTL graduate humanities)
    • Using many words is also helpful, as full texts are being searched (e.g., “scholarship of teaching and learning” “microteaching” graduate education qualitative effective humanities).
  • Margy accurately notes that “not all SoTL work makes it into scholarly literature,” so regular Google will show us conference presentations, in-house publications, blog posts, and the like.
    • The allintitle: command is especially useful in Google.
    • She encouraged us to “think geographically” because teaching and learning environments and approaches and the resulting scholarship can vary by location. (Think of the Oxford tutorial in the UK.)
      • To search academic sites within the UK: SoTL “graduate student” site:ac.uk
      • In the US: SoTL “graduate student” site:edu
      • In Australia: SoTL “graduate student” site:edu.au
      • There is no set academic domain for Canada, but she shared her custom Google search for Canadian academic searches.
Then, as we turned to our laptops to practice these strategies with our area of interest, Margy circulated for specific advice. Notably, quite a few participants changed seats to talk and search with colleagues they hadn’t met before but who’d expressed interest in a similar topic. Behold, the networking power of SoTL. Over time, of course, the specific strategies above will evolve with the changing tools and technologies…which is why we need more SoTL-active librarians like Margy embedded in our SoTL work and our SoTL community. References Foster, N.F. (2010) The librarian-student-faculty triangle: conflicting research strategies? Paper Presented at the Association of Research Libraries’ Library Assessment Conference, Baltimore, MD. Weller, S. (2011). New lecturers’ accounts of reading higher education research. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 93-106.
  • Share:
author avatar
ISSOTL Admin

Previous post

Conference on Excellent Practices in Mentoring Undergraduate Research
February 13, 2016

Next post

Teaching Ideas Competition Award
February 17, 2016

You may also like

EdVee+Blog+Image
EdVee: A Visual Diagnostic and Course Design Tool for Constructive Alignment
27 January, 2023
75079_image
Searching and Reviewing the Literature on Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): An Academic Literacies Perspective Parts 1 & 2
27 January, 2023
69375_image
A Pedagogy of Slow: Integrating Experiences of Physical and Virtual Gallery Spaces to Foster Critical Engagement in SoTL
26 January, 2023

Leave A Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search

Categories

  • Blog
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal Content

Archives

  • January 2023 (7)
  • December 2022 (1)
  • November 2022 (1)
  • October 2022 (6)
  • September 2022 (2)
  • August 2022 (4)
  • July 2022 (5)
  • June 2022 (4)
  • May 2022 (2)
  • April 2022 (2)
  • March 2022 (9)
  • February 2022 (7)
  • January 2022 (6)
  • December 2021 (4)
  • November 2021 (4)
  • October 2021 (2)
  • September 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (1)
  • June 2021 (1)
  • May 2021 (2)
  • April 2021 (1)
  • March 2021 (2)
  • February 2021 (5)
  • January 2021 (2)
  • December 2020 (4)
  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (4)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (3)
  • January 2020 (2)
  • November 2019 (5)
  • October 2019 (31)
  • September 2019 (3)
  • July 2019 (1)
  • April 2019 (3)
  • March 2019 (27)
  • January 2019 (2)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (6)
  • August 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • March 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (3)
  • December 2017 (2)
  • November 2017 (1)
  • October 2017 (3)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • August 2017 (5)
  • June 2017 (4)
  • May 2017 (2)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (3)
  • February 2017 (2)
  • January 2017 (4)
  • November 2016 (3)
  • October 2016 (4)
  • September 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (1)
  • May 2016 (1)
  • April 2016 (3)
  • March 2016 (1)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (1)
  • December 2015 (3)
  • November 2015 (6)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (1)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (2)
  • April 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (2)
  • January 2015 (3)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (1)
  • August 2014 (1)
  • May 2014 (1)
  • April 2014 (1)
  • January 2014 (3)
  • December 2013 (3)
  • November 2013 (1)

ISSOTL

© 2023 International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL) All rights reserved.

Contact Us

MENU

ABOUT

MEMBERS

OPPORTUNITIES

EVENTS

PUBLICATIONS

UPDATES

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Youtube

Web Design by Clio Websites. Powered by WordPress.

Login with your site account

Lost your password?