• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • New
    • Feed
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Bylaws
    • Origins
    • Strategic Plan
    • Annual Reports
    • Administrative Centre Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Members
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Join or Renew
    • Get Involved
    • Awards
  • Opportunities
    • Interest Groups
    • The Conference
    • The Journal
    • International Collaborative Writing Groups
    • ISSOTL Fellows Program
    • Committees
    • Board of Directors
    • Awards
  • Events
    • Annual Conference
      • Conference Listing
  • Publications
    • Teaching & Learning Inquiry
    • ISSOTL Blog
  • Updates
    • Blog
    • News
    • Jobs
    • ISSOTL Social Media
    • Become a Member
    • Log in
International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL)
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Bylaws
    • Origins
    • Strategic Plan
    • Annual Reports
    • Administrative Centre Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Members
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Join or Renew
    • Get Involved
    • Awards
  • Opportunities
    • Interest Groups
    • The Conference
    • The Journal
    • International Collaborative Writing Groups
    • ISSOTL Fellows Program
    • Committees
    • Board of Directors
    • Awards
  • Events
    • Annual Conference
      • Conference Listing
  • Publications
    • Teaching & Learning Inquiry
    • ISSOTL Blog
  • Updates
    • Blog
    • News
    • Jobs
    • ISSOTL Social Media
    • Become a Member
    • Log in

Blog

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Blog
  • Where do presenters at ISSOTL come from and what can this tell us about SoTL? Part one: An International society

Where do presenters at ISSOTL come from and what can this tell us about SoTL? Part one: An International society

  • Posted by ISSOTL Admin
  • Categories Blog
  • Date September 22, 2019

Brian Jackson, Associate Professor, Mount Royal University, bjackson@mtroyal.ca
Margy MacMillan, Professor Emerita, Mount Royal University, margymac@gmail.com

Does the ISSOTL conference location matter? Our work shows that hosting a conference has a definite short term impact on local interest in SoTL – information that might be useful to those making a case for hosting to their institutions and sponsors. We don’t think this result surprises anyone, but using maps as an investigative tool revealed that the relationship is more complex than it appears and raised other questions about SoTL cultures. SoTL folks may also find maps as data presentation interesting. We rarely see maps in SoTL, but they could be useful in presenting data on students, areas students choose to research, locations for field work, or other studies of SoTL work.

We used information from conference programs to map the institutions behind the people presenting at ISSOTL conferences from 2012-2018. Some of this data was obtained through publicly available programs, and some through Margy’s work on recent conferences. In our analysis:

  • We used only the main program, not any subsequent updates.

  • We counted all presenters from each institution once for each conference regardless of how many presentations they were involved with.

  • Being listed in the program doesn’t necessarily mean the person came to present.

  • People move around. We counted presenters as members of the institution recorded in each year’s conference program.

We totalled the number of presenters from each institution for each conference and developed a massive list of institutional street addresses that Brian used to map the data. 

From data to maps

Brian used Google Maps to geocode street addresses to longitude and latitude coordinates for export into ArcGIS to allow for much better analysis of geospatial data and much more interesting maps.

He used ArcGIS to calculate the ‘as the crow flies’ distance between each represented institution and the conference location for each year to show the relative proximity of each presenter’s institution to the host site. He then exported spreadsheets from ArcGIS that included the names of each institution, the conferences at which each was represented, the number of presenters from each institution, and the distance between those institutions and the conference location to complement our visual analysis of the maps.

As you can see from the maps below, each ISSOTL conference has its own pattern of presenters. These maps show both a core group of ‘frequent flyer’ institutions, consistently represented at all conferences, and strong showing by presenters from institutions in the immediate region. A local conference is usually less expensive to attend than a distant one, making it easier for those new to SoTL or without significant professional development budgets, such as students and precarious/contract faculty and staff, to participate. These maps raise questions for further study, including:

  • What are national/regional differences in SoTL that impact presenting at conferences?

  • Whose voices aren’t (yet) part of the conversation?

  • Are there differences in SoTL in zones that are hot (red) and those where it is more dispersed, but still present (blue)?

 

Heat Maps, 2012-2018: 

Hamilton, 2012

Raleigh, 2013

Quebec City, 2014

Melbourne, 2015

Los Angeles, 2016

Calgary, 2017

Bergen, 2018

Frequent flyers

As the maps show, certain institutions always send presenters to ISSOTL, regardless of conference location. The “frequent flyers” that sent at least one presenter to conferences in all 7 years of the study are:

  • Elon University

  • Georgia Southern University

  • Lund University

  • McMaster University

  • Mount Royal University

  • Queensland University of Technology

  • University College Cork

  • University of Auckland

  • University of British Columbia

  • University of Calgary

  • University of Queensland

  • University of Toronto

 

In an upcoming blog post, we’ll look more closely at the nature of participation by frequent flyer institutions.

This data raises some interesting questions for further study. If presenting at ISSOTL is a proxy for SoTL involvement, there are lots of directions here for further research, including:

  • What are the common features of these ‘frequent flyer’ institutions and can they be replicated? 

  • Is there an impact of regional clustering – e.g. in the Georgia/North Carolina area, Melbourne, Calgary, or Sweden/Norway that might be evident in collaborative work between scholars at different institutions?

  • The list includes institutions that vary by size and mandate – what factors don’t affect SoTL participation?

  • What other factors spark the spread of SoTL – faculty moving from place to place, government or consortial priorities and initiatives, or diffusion along disciplinary lines?

And most importantly,

  • What questions do these maps spark for you?

 

With thanks to Karen Manarin for reviewing and improving our work.

  • Share:
author avatar
ISSOTL Admin

Previous post

SoTL Interview with Gary Poole
September 22, 2019

Next post

Where do presenters at ISSOTL come from and what can this tell us about SoTL? Part Two: A closer look at the ISSOTL maps
September 30, 2019

You may also like

Blog Image
Finding the Public in our Public SoTL
29 May, 2023
Hand_Pinted_Kintsugi_Pottery_Bowl (1)
Teaching the Inevitable: Embracing a Pedagogy of Failure
15 May, 2023
Elon+University+campus
Discussing Identities and Building Relationships: From Students to Colleagues
15 May, 2023

Search

Categories

  • Blog
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal Content

Archives

  • May 2023 (5)
  • April 2023 (6)
  • March 2023 (5)
  • February 2023 (4)
  • January 2023 (7)
  • December 2022 (1)
  • November 2022 (1)
  • October 2022 (6)
  • September 2022 (2)
  • August 2022 (4)
  • July 2022 (5)
  • June 2022 (4)
  • May 2022 (2)
  • April 2022 (2)
  • March 2022 (9)
  • February 2022 (7)
  • January 2022 (6)
  • December 2021 (4)
  • November 2021 (4)
  • October 2021 (2)
  • September 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (1)
  • June 2021 (1)
  • May 2021 (2)
  • April 2021 (1)
  • March 2021 (2)
  • February 2021 (5)
  • January 2021 (2)
  • December 2020 (4)
  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (4)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (3)
  • January 2020 (2)
  • November 2019 (5)
  • October 2019 (31)
  • September 2019 (3)
  • July 2019 (1)
  • April 2019 (3)
  • March 2019 (27)
  • January 2019 (2)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (6)
  • August 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • March 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (3)
  • December 2017 (2)
  • November 2017 (1)
  • October 2017 (3)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • August 2017 (5)
  • June 2017 (4)
  • May 2017 (2)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (3)
  • February 2017 (2)
  • January 2017 (4)
  • November 2016 (3)
  • October 2016 (4)
  • September 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (1)
  • May 2016 (1)
  • April 2016 (3)
  • March 2016 (1)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (1)
  • December 2015 (3)
  • November 2015 (6)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (1)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (2)
  • April 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (2)
  • January 2015 (3)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (1)
  • August 2014 (1)
  • May 2014 (1)
  • April 2014 (1)
  • January 2014 (3)
  • December 2013 (3)
  • November 2013 (1)

ISSOTL

© 2023 International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL) All rights reserved.

Contact Us

MENU

ABOUT

MEMBERS

OPPORTUNITIES

EVENTS

PUBLICATIONS

UPDATES

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Youtube

Web Design by Clio Websites. Powered by WordPress.

Login with your site account

Lost your password?