• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Bylaws
    • Strategic Plan
    • Annual Reports
    • Administrative Centre Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Members
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Join or Renew
    • Get Involved
    • Awards
  • Opportunities
    • Interest Groups
    • The Conference
    • The Journal
    • International Collaborative Writing Groups
    • ISSOTL Fellows Program
    • Committees
    • Board of Directors
  • Events
    • Annual Conference
      • Conference Listing
  • Publications
    • Teaching & Learning Inquiry
    • ISSOTL Blog
  • Updates
    • Blog
    • News
    • Jobs
    • ISSOTL Social Media
    • Become a Member
    • Log in
International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL)
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Bylaws
    • Strategic Plan
    • Annual Reports
    • Administrative Centre Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Members
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Join or Renew
    • Get Involved
    • Awards
  • Opportunities
    • Interest Groups
    • The Conference
    • The Journal
    • International Collaborative Writing Groups
    • ISSOTL Fellows Program
    • Committees
    • Board of Directors
  • Events
    • Annual Conference
      • Conference Listing
  • Publications
    • Teaching & Learning Inquiry
    • ISSOTL Blog
  • Updates
    • Blog
    • News
    • Jobs
    • ISSOTL Social Media
    • Become a Member
    • Log in

Blog

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Blog
  • Promoting Critical Thinking and Learning in a Large-Enrolment Humanities Course: A Case Study

Promoting Critical Thinking and Learning in a Large-Enrolment Humanities Course: A Case Study

  • Posted by Natalie Speth
  • Categories Blog, Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal Content
  • Date January 26, 2022
  • Comments 0 comment

By Kiruthika RAGUPATHI,  Zi Hui YEO, Hui Chieh LOY
National University of Singapore

In this blog post, we reflect on what led us to embark on this SoTL project, why we care about this work, and what we want others to take away from our research. 

The project arose from an actual instruction context. Loy teaches a high-enrolment philosophy course at the National University of Singapore, a publicly funded research university with a strong mission for education. In his course, Loy makes deliberate and regular use of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) both to enforce learning and application of concepts and to incentivize and scaffold informal peer discussions.

While multiple-choice questions are nothing new, it is often thought that they are not appropriate for humanities instruction. More typically, instructors ask for essays and emphasize seminar discussions. But such modes are labor-intensive so it is harder to maintain consistency of quality across a large enrolment.

Loy’s distinctive use of the format in the context of a large enrolment course is explored in our research. The quizzes maximize students’ chances to discuss with each other. The questions require that students pay attention to details and make inferences from the information provided. Since the incorrect options usually incorporate tempting errors of understanding and reasoning that are often found among students, “crowdsourcing” will not invariably give the right answer. Students are thus motivated to put in their own effort and make the most of peer discussions, especially if they desire to do well in the final, individual summative assessments. 

Initially, Loy collected data mainly to improve the course. As an academic developer, Kiruthika was interested to find ways to share good practices across the campus. Knowing each other before the study, we quickly discovered the shared interest and started collaborating. Zi Hui tutored for the module at one point, and her strong training in social scientific methodology makes her an apt addition to the team. As she notes: “in my five years of undergraduate studies, I have never seen such a large proportion of students in a course this engaged in learning and proactively collaborating with one another. As someone who has personally experienced how isolating large-scale courses can be for certain students, I believe this work needs to be shared.”

To read the full TLI article, please visit here.

Read more about our work at:
Ragupathi, Kiruthika, Zi Hui Yeo, and Hui Chieh Loy. 2022. “Promoting Critical Thinking and Learning in a Large-Enrolment Humanities Course: A Case Study.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 10. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.6

  • Share:
author avatar
Natalie Speth

Previous post

Blog by Brit Paris
January 26, 2022

Next post

Student and Faculty Interpretations of Institutional Websites' Messaging of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
February 1, 2022

You may also like

EdVee+Blog+Image
EdVee: A Visual Diagnostic and Course Design Tool for Constructive Alignment
27 January, 2023
75079_image
Searching and Reviewing the Literature on Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): An Academic Literacies Perspective Parts 1 & 2
27 January, 2023
69375_image
A Pedagogy of Slow: Integrating Experiences of Physical and Virtual Gallery Spaces to Foster Critical Engagement in SoTL
26 January, 2023

Leave A Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search

Categories

  • Blog
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal Content

Archives

  • January 2023 (7)
  • December 2022 (1)
  • November 2022 (1)
  • October 2022 (6)
  • September 2022 (2)
  • August 2022 (4)
  • July 2022 (5)
  • June 2022 (4)
  • May 2022 (2)
  • April 2022 (2)
  • March 2022 (9)
  • February 2022 (7)
  • January 2022 (6)
  • December 2021 (4)
  • November 2021 (4)
  • October 2021 (2)
  • September 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (1)
  • June 2021 (1)
  • May 2021 (2)
  • April 2021 (1)
  • March 2021 (2)
  • February 2021 (5)
  • January 2021 (2)
  • December 2020 (4)
  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (4)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (3)
  • January 2020 (2)
  • November 2019 (5)
  • October 2019 (31)
  • September 2019 (3)
  • July 2019 (1)
  • April 2019 (3)
  • March 2019 (27)
  • January 2019 (2)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (6)
  • August 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • March 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (3)
  • December 2017 (2)
  • November 2017 (1)
  • October 2017 (3)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • August 2017 (5)
  • June 2017 (4)
  • May 2017 (2)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (3)
  • February 2017 (2)
  • January 2017 (4)
  • November 2016 (3)
  • October 2016 (4)
  • September 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (1)
  • May 2016 (1)
  • April 2016 (3)
  • March 2016 (1)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (1)
  • December 2015 (3)
  • November 2015 (6)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (1)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (2)
  • April 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (2)
  • January 2015 (3)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (1)
  • August 2014 (1)
  • May 2014 (1)
  • April 2014 (1)
  • January 2014 (3)
  • December 2013 (3)
  • November 2013 (1)

ISSOTL

© 2023 International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL) All rights reserved.

Contact Us

MENU

ABOUT

MEMBERS

OPPORTUNITIES

EVENTS

PUBLICATIONS

UPDATES

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Youtube

Web Design by Clio Websites. Powered by WordPress.

Login with your site account

Lost your password?